Monday 13 June 2011

MCA President Chua Soi Lek Penis is a Symptom of UMNO Religious Puritanism, Chua Soi Lek's Girlfriend Stripping and Teasing on Camera.


What's most amazing to me is that anyone in politics in this age could still be stupid enough to think that the coverup won't be what kills them. That's not just a matter of the age of publicness and the net that I write about. It is perhaps Richard Nixon's most important legacy. I gave Weiner too much credit when I thought he must have figured this out
.
MCA President Chua Soi Lek has taken pains to stress that the Chinese voters must be careful in performing what he termed as the 'Chinese Balancing Act' which is maintaining MCA's voice in a strong manner in the BN coalition while at the same time also voting in a strong Opposition.



This will guarantee the Chinese community the best of both worlds, according to Chua, as doing that will enable the Chinese to have a say in government and at the same time have a watchdog to voice its displeasure should the government step out of line pertaining to Chinese issues.
related article
READMORE

But in the 12th General Election in March 2008, Chua continued to opine, the Chinese miscalculated and have overdone it by giving too much power to the DAP, thus rendering MCA ineffective in the Cabinet.
The MCA president freely admitted this and said the imbalance needed to be corrected by the Chinese in the coming 13th General Election so that MCA can regain strength in the Cabinet.
And if they didn't and the MCA continues to perform poorly in the polls, then Chua warned the MCA will itself withdraw from the Cabinet by not accepting any positions.
Blackmail doesn't jive in an era of New Politics
But few people agreed with Chua. Many have in fact accused him of trying to "blackmail" his community.
"This is all rubbish as in the era of New Politics, the Chinese need not perform any so-called 'Balancing Act' because Pakatan Rakyat is capable of looking after Chinese interests," PAS MP for Tumpat Kamaruddin Jaffar told Malaysia Chronicle.
"Whether MCA is in government or not, it makes no difference due to MCA being incapable of making any demands, which they themselves have admitted."
MCA has had problems making headway in Chinese issues because each time they attempt to do so, they will be shouted down by UMNO leaders and told to shut up.
The latest incident was in the PSD Scholarship fiasco where Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nazri Aziz berated Deputy Education Minister, MCA's Wee Ka Siong, for 'trying to be a Chinese hero' when he tried to champion the request for scholarships by Chinese students.
After his initial outburst, not a further squeak was heard from Wee after Nazri's public rebuke.
This shows that it is immaterial whether MCA is represented or not in the goverment, said Kamaruddin.
Gibberish
Chua has also been plugging the line that the MCA was the one and only party responsible for championing the cause of Chinese Education by highlighting the building of Chinese schools, UTAR and KTAR (Kolej Tunku Abdul Rahman).
For this, he has drawn fire from the Chinese community for speaking "gibberish".
"He needs to be reminded that providing schools is the duty of the government whereas the Chinese community paid for UTAR and KTAR and its fees are still more costly than those of public universities," MP for Gopeng Lee Boon Chye told Malaysia Chronicle.
Gauging from the slew of brickbats, Chua has not been able to prevent the slide in the MCA. The more he talks or reveals of his aspirations for the community, the more they get upset and reject his party.
Perhaps, the time has come for Chua Soi Lek to face the truth. As far as the Malaysian Chinese are concerned, his are empty words and he has become known as a "kong sam, kong sei' president or 'talk 3, talk 4' (meaning he speaks gibberish).
I just want to get this on the record and off my (fully clothed) chest: I was wrong about Anthony Weiner.
I'd said nothing about the whole hoo-ha because I didn't think it was worth the attention. Then I got a call from Howard Kurtz'Reliable Sources to come on last Sunday and talk about it. My wife said, Why are you doing that? I said, I'll be on the right side. As always, she was right. On the show, I said that media were using this as an opportunity for sophomoric jokes and that the fuss over a penis was a symptom of American Puritanism. What's the worst that happened here? I asked: So what if he had a stupid picture on his phone and accidentally tweeted it, so long as he wasn't sexually harassing anyone? But that's not the worst that happened.
Weiner lied. That is the story. That's what haters said in email to me after the CNN segment. They were right.
What's most amazing to me is that anyone in politics in this age could still be stupid enough to think that the coverup won't be what kills them. That's not just a matter of the age of publicness and the net that I write about. It is perhaps Richard Nixon's most important legacy. I gave Weiner too much credit when I thought he must have figured this out.
The personal irony for me is that I've long thought Weiner is a weasel. I chose to overlook that in this case. Wrong again. I confronted him at a Personal Democracy Forum a few years ago (it so happens that PDF11 is going on right now) over his support of noxious legislation to raise fines on so-called indecency on broadcast. Weiner would go onto Howard Stern's show as an alleged fan to get the attention but then he'd turn around and throw Stern, the First Amendment, and freedom of speech to the wind for a politically expedient vote. So he voted with prudery and isn't it always the case that the prudes are the ones with something to hide? Now we see what he was hiding.
I'm trying to pull back from my personal embarrassment and stupidity at giving this schmuck the benefit of the doubt and see the lessons here about our age of publicness. There are many. It fascinates me that Twitter provides such an easy way for people to connect for *any* purpose. It astounds me that Weiner thought he could do this under his name with his face and think it would not end up being a public act. Once he was public to the extent of sharing with one person -- a stranger -- then it's nothing for that to be shared with the world in an instant. All this affirms my belief that the only sane way to operate in one's life today -- as a public figure especially -- is as if *anything* you do can and will be seen by *anyone.* I would still like to think that eventually this will lead to an assumption, a default of transparency.
But then, I keep forgetting to calculate into this view the forgetful, venal stupidity of the public official. That's where I was wrong. Have I said that enough?

Here is a shy but fun 
MCA President Chua Soi Lek's  girlfriend stripping and teasing her  on camera... We don't really get to see her face but her body is nice and we do get to see a lot of it. Anyway,




No comments:

Post a Comment