Info Minister Rapist Rais Yatim says a directive, stipulating no restrictions on coverage of A topless Slut Walk to guide TV 3 viewers aimed at promoting anti Gov't anti-Bersih drive"These women must follow these steps to check their breasts monthly,"
This is supposedly one of his mistresses, the air stewardess that was caught having an affair with him in Johor Bahru. And she is said to be the same lady that he took to Mongolia on a trip with the then PM.
UMNO Booze and ladies, all you need in life.
Here is his wife not to be confuse with his mistress enjoying a cold one too. She look totally wasted but she seem to be hotter than his mistress.
.
.
Everywhere you go now, the topic of conversation soon turns to an impending event in Delhi.Should women in Delhi, people ask, do a Slut Walk? Are they doing it just because women in Canada did so?
Before one looks for an answer to that question, here are some startling facts: ever since the first Slut Walk in Toronto on 3rd April this year, similar walks have taken place in cities like Chicago, Edinburgh, Sao Paulo, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, London, Sydney, Brasilia.. Not just that: Slut walks have been planned in the near future in disparate places Lisbon, Wellington, Auckland, Morelia, Seoul, Curitiba, Helsinki, Munich, Dublin …Obviously, something about that first march struck a chord with women all around the world.
Michael Sanguinetti didn’t know what he was starting, did he? This Toronto police officer while speaking about women’s safety said that if women didn’t want to be victimized, they “should avoid dressing like sluts”. This set off an immediate furore and Sanguinetti apologised, but by then the matter had gone way beyond one cop’s comments. In fact, the perfervid reaction all across the world was because Sanguinetti’s words were like many men’s around the world: if a woman is raped, it’s her own fault. It’s she who has provoked a man into sexual violence because of the way she dressed or behaved.
There is an obvious reversal of responsibility here. Initially conservative patriarchal societies insisted that their women be covered in order to protect them from the hostile or prurient male gaze. Somewhere along the way, the purdah/hijab/ghungat remained but its justification had changed: women now had to cover themselves not for their own protection but to protect men. Protect men from their libidinous nature. Protect men from themselves. Men, in effect had conveniently surrendered their responsibility for their own behaviour; they could be expected to behave only if temptation was removed from their paths.
Luckily this isn’t so across cultures or societies. Many tribal women, by tradition and poverty, are bare breasted and generally under dressed. Do their men use that as an excuse to pounce on them? At the other end of the social and economic scale, you have young men and women partying without any parental control. You don’t hear of too many sexual assaults in these circles, and even in the rare case that this does happen, the accused doesn’t blame the woman for being ‘provocatively’ dressed. But you will hear mullahs and other so-called ‘Men of God’ lay the blame on women and you will hear men who take vows of celibacy which they find difficult to keep because, they say, of the presence of loose women.
Sex Video Screen Shots:
No wonder Slut Walks have caught on. The feminist movement, which has been in a quiet phase for a while, is now saying aggressively that enough is enough, women refuse to take the blame for the criminal behavior of men. It’s about time this happened in our country because sexual violence is far too common and news of one sex crime ghastlier than the other is a daily occurrence. Since men are either incapable, or unwilling, to do anything about it is women who will have to fight this battle, a battle that will be long and hard.
But Slut Walks? Why should this new women’s movement be led by marches under this label? The Toronto demonstration and the others that have followed in the West have said that a subsidiary objective of the walks is to reclaim the word ‘slut’ and get rid of its pejorative connotation.
It seems like a dangerous diversionary exercise, one taking away attention from the main objective. After all, there is something like ‘sluttish’ or promiscuous behaviour, which is hardly commendable. The male equivalent ‘womaniser’ is equally pejorative, and after recent high profile cases like that of the IMF’s disgraced chief, no one – man or woman – looks upon womanising with an indulgent eye.
There is also something called ‘provocative’ behaviour, or to use a less loaded word, ‘inappropriate’ behaviour. You don’t dress in beach wear in the main market square; you don’t don party wear to the workplace; casual and minimal clothing acceptable amongst your circle of friends may not be right for a locality where the dress code is conservative. These rules, which most of us accept, apply to both men and women.
So when the Slut Walking women of Toronto or London or Sydney march in their bras, it can only be an attention-grabbing device like the bare bodies in PETA ads. It cannot be a serious statement of intent that a woman can dress in any manner she wants, even if it is completely inappropriate in the context. If men must take responsibility for their behavior, so should women. Sluttish behaviour – or for that matter, womanising behaviour – will draw its own responses.
Here are the video screen shots:
A general criticism of the walk organised in Delhi is that this does not address the main concerns of the large majority of Indian women, the rural or the urban poor: female foeticide, child marriage, dowry deaths, khaph panchayats etc. This criticism ignores the obvious, which is that most movements are led by the educated elite, and are therefore bound to reflect their pre-occupations. This criticism is unwarranted for another reason: if the Slut Walks draw attention to the concerns of urban women, they will be the starting point to voice the concerns of all women.
For comparison, here are is Karen Ang:
Is it just a coincidence that when this blog post controversial pictures relating to Malaysian politicians it is block by Blogger? It would be nice if Blogger/Google actually send an email saying why they keep blocking the blog after interesting pictures relating to Malaysian politicians are posted. If the GutterUncensored.comis not being constantly block because of controversial pictures relating to Malaysian politicians, Blogger/Google should say what is that reason. They have the admin email to do so. And as for those Malaysian politicians that are behind the bullshit, screw you. Below are a few pictures sent in by a contributor several months ago and are said to be of Nazri Aziz in a compromising position with a young woman that may or may not be his wife. These pictures were lost in 300 gigs of files but since the blog was blocked we had some time to search for them. You assholes pressure Blogger again to blocked this blog you will just be giving the authors of this blog more free time to search for more things you might not like. The othercompromising position pictures were included in the same submitted set of Nazri Aziz with the young woman on top of him but the contributor did not say who they are. The photos below those are a few the drunken and womanizing pictures of sons of the Malaysian politicians that I think cause the the site to be blocked two days ago. I think Nazri Aziz‘s has a better taste for girls than his father but to each his own. DON’T FUCK WITH THE GUTTER UNCENSORED. Why you think Edison Chen left this blog alone? That Edison Chen is a very smart man, too bad the politicians in Malaysia are idiots. Pussy loving, whore fucking, secret mistress having rich men but still idiots. Click on pictures to enlarge.
But why not change the label while keeping the content intact? As Mahatma Gandhi showed during the freedom struggle, the importance of symbols we could relate to can not the underestimated. Why not, therefore, call the Delhi march the Sari Walk? Or, even better, the Skirt Walk?
No comments:
Post a Comment